Ever heard of the Academic Zodiac?

lu-lu-lunacy!
Apparently there is a modern "scientific astrology" practice for those who are aware of NASA... in other words, intuitive people are leaning toward the specific.

Geez, the data this guy Klaudio Zic has gathered and interpreted is immense, yet it is all just as immature and arbitrary as any newspaper horoscope. He cites the "coincidence" of the WTC tragedy happening precisely when the Moon entered Orion and Osama bin Laden's charts reveal his Moon in Orion... whatever. Do we really have to believe that the stars can predict or reflect our instances on earth to have reverance for them?

This Academic Zodiac is not based on the geocentric, misguided astrology practices that have been incorrect for over 2,000 years, he claims. I am well aware that the earth has shifted and that the planets have no physical resemblance to the Roman gods' personality traits, but my intuition is guided more by how I know a person. I try not to pull out a random noun or adjective, apply it to an astrological sign, and continue to use that word for future interpretations. I think there is something much bigger and much more mysterious to us than anything we could determine. Shuffling tarot cards is not a warm-up to get my psychic energies flowing- it is simply an exercise in blanking out; then I am ready to absorb, with guidance, a visual influence.